This Stock Could Soar up to 10% After Announcement

Analysts give Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) a lot of credit these days.

The company can single-handedly alter a business environment overnight … or at least that’s what analysts would lead you to believe.

Amazon’s latest market-moving announcement was that it was close to deciding on entering the online pharmaceutical drug marketplace.

Let me repeat that.

Amazon is “close to deciding.” It hasn’t even decided yet.

But that didn’t stop stocks like CVS Health Corp. (NYSE: CVS) from dropping over 7% in the days following the news. It’s as if analysts think whatever Amazon touches is automatically changed forever.

That’s simply not the case.

The reality is that Amazon is not afraid to fail. That’s what has made the company the giant it is today.

But it’s also given Amazon a long track record of failures when it comes to entering a new market.

As I’ll show you in a second, there are many failures as examples.

But it’s this history of failure for the company that causes me to see these attempts to enter new markets as an opportunity to buy the same stocks that were sold off on the announcement, despite what analysts say.

Let me explain…

Epic Fail

I’ll start with a list of Amazon’s failures over the years since these don’t seem to come up often when an analyst is praising the company.

The Fire Phone is probably the biggest.

Expected to compete with the iPhone and Samsung phones, and met with much praise right out of the gate from Amazon users, it ended up being a big flop. At one point, Amazon couldn’t even give the phone away for $0.99. Amazon wrote off $170 million for its failed attempt into the smartphone market.

It launched Destinations in 2015 to be a marketplace for hotel deals. This failed in just six months.

Amazon Local was launched in 2011 to take on Groupon and LivingSocial. That was deemed a failure in 2015.

Amazon Wallet was a mobile wallet to compete with Apple Pay and Samsung Pay. After just six months of being on the market, it was shut down and considered a failure.

Amazon Local Register was set to compete with Square Reader, an attachment on your mobile device to accept credit cards. In 2016, this product was shuttered and called a failure as well.

And these are just a few of its failed forays into new markets.

Some other failed attempts are Music Importer, TestDrive, WebPay, Endless.com, Askville and Kozmo.com. This list doesn’t include failed ideas that never made it to the market, or ideas that are currently on the market but have failed miserably at living up to analysts’ expectations.

For example, Amazon entered the food delivery space in 2015, attempting to make companies like GrubHub Inc. (NYSE: GRUB) irrelevant. But GrubHub still controls about half of that market thanks to a recent acquisition, compared to Amazon’s 11% market share.

And then there’s handmade goods.

Amazon entered this market in 2015 with Handmade at Amazon, and analysts were positive it would be the end for Etsy Inc. (Nasdaq: ETSY). But Etsy, the first to make homemade goods widely marketable and which Amazon was chasing, continues to thrive, with expected sales growth of more than 15% each year for the next three years.

To Amazon’s credit, it has gotten some things right — like selling books, an online marketplace and the cloud.

But the list of things it has gotten wrong is much longer.

That’s the reason why when Amazon wants to enter a new market, it doesn’t faze me.

A Lot of Red Tape for Amazon

And that brings me to your opportunity today.

With Amazon’s mention of the pharmaceutical drug space, CVS plunged on the news.

Look: Even if Amazon does make that move into the pharmaceutical drug market, it doesn’t mean everyone suddenly stops going to CVS.

CVS is the largest, and most diversified, pharmacy chain in the U.S. With 9,700 pharmacies across the country, it also has over 1,000 MinuteClinics to quickly get patients looked at for minor issues without having to go out of your way to go to a doctor’s office — which I think we can agree everyone hates doing.

Besides being able to get checked for an illness at the pharmacy, you can get your prescriptions filled almost right away.

CVS also has a mail-order segment, which is what Amazon wants to compete with, and a long-term care focus, among other specialty needs.

I know Amazon is all about online sales. But there is a lot of red tape, which I’m sure is what Amazon is looking at, about dropping pain meds on someone’s doorstep — most regulators don’t want pills ending up in just anyone’s hands.

So, there is a wall of red tape around that process, and CVS and others are working on breaking through that as well. So Amazon won’t be alone there.

That’s why I still like owning CVS even if Amazon enters the market. Because as Etsy, GrubHub and Amazon’s countless other failures have proven, not everything Amazon touches is disrupted.

And at this point, Amazon still may avoid this market altogether, and that announcement could send CVS popping 10% higher practically overnight.

Regards,

Chad Shoop, CMT
Editor, Automatic Profits Alert

In this exciting NEW VIDEO, Wall Street legend and former multibillion hedge fund manager Paul Mampilly pulls back the curtain on the biggest investment opportunity in the market today. What insiders are calling “The Greatest Innovation in History,” this revolution will mint more millionaires and billions than any technology that came before it. Right now, the current market for this technology is just $235 billion, but given how fast this technology is moving experts predict it will soar to $19 trillion by 2020. But 8,000% growth is just the beginning—and now’s your chance to get in on the action. [CONTINUE TO VIDEO]

Source: Banyan Hill 

Which Gets You Richer: Starting a Company or Investing in One?

A couple years ago, I bumped into John Dessauer, editor of John Dessauer’s Outlook, at the exhibit hall of The MoneyShow in Orlando.

He spied The Oxford Club logo on my lapel.

“I know Bill Bonner,” he said, referring to the Founder and President of Agora Publishing, the parent company of The Oxford Club. “I worked for him when he was broke.”

I smiled and nodded. “He’s not broke now.”

More than 30 years ago, Bill Bonner founded a tiny company that has become the world’s largest publisher of health, travel and investment letters, becoming a near-billionaire in the process.

He once told me that the company survived the early years only because he “was a pretty good copywriter… and a pretty good plumber.”

I’m not sure how he did it. Bill claims he doesn’t know either.

Yes, he understands the industry, devoted his life to it and hired some smart people who hired a lot of other smart people. But, in my experience, Agora is truly a one-off.

Newbies find the freewheeling, largely unstructured, internally competitive, risk-prone nature of the company either totally invigorating or completely petrifying. Employees are encouraged to be creative, ambitious and entrepreneurial and are given plenty of freedom and incentives – or enough rope to hang themselves, depending on how you look at it.

When Bill gives advice – which he rarely does, even when it is solicited – it generally pays to listen.

“More Than Just the Annual Profits”

Yet I’ve found myself in disagreement with him lately. In his first Daily Reckoning column of 2015, he argued that the best way to generate and preserve wealth is not by investing in the stock market, but by starting your own business.

According to Bill…

Owning and controlling a business is a much better way to make money [than owning stocks].As a general rule, the closer you are to the source of earnings, the more you are likely to get. When you control a business, you make sure you get your share of the profits. When someone else controls the business, he often makes sure you don’t.

Owning your own business brings you more than just the annual profits. You also can get employment, use of company cars and real estate, and a business credit card to cover some of your expenses. You get invited to the company holiday party, too.

And if you pay attention, you understand how the business works and what it is worth.

This is different from the passive owner of a few publicly traded shares.

Indeed, it is. And yet…

Do You Have What It Takes?

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the majority of new businesses fail within the first four years. That’s a daunting consideration for anyone contemplating a new enterprise.

You may not have enough money to start a business – or access to enough capital to keep it going.

Consider the time involved, commonly known as “the burden of retail.” As a new business owner, you will be the first to arrive, the last to leave and the last to get paid.

Do you have the expertise? Do you know your market? Will you be able to balance the competing demands of customers, suppliers, employees and creditors?

Do you have a knack for hiring good people? That can be a tricky business.

In my experience as a manager, I’ve found that roughly 20% of employees do more than what they’re asked, take whatever actions are needed to get a job done, learn the skills they need to help the business and their career, and are the foundation of everything you do. (Your biggest problem will be challenging and retaining them.)

Seventy-five percent of employees do no more or less than what’s required and are in the parking lot by 5:01. (That’s fine, incidentally. They work to live and find fulfillment elsewhere.)

The other 5% tend to be gadabouts, shirkers, malingerers or troublemakers and need to be shown the door as quickly as possible.

This is tiring. At least it was for me.

Even if your business is a roaring success, that may change. A family in my hometown owned a profitable furniture store for generations. Within a matter of months, it went bust.

I used to know a lot of wealthy homebuilders. Today I know none.

There are quality of life issues, too. When you run a business, it is never far from your mind. You spend a lot of time with bookkeepers, lawyers, tax consultants, disgruntled employees and dissatisfied customers. Is this how you want to spend your day?

That’s why I prefer another type of business ownership: stocks, the best-performing asset of the last 200 years.

A Whole Lot Simpler

Even if you lack the time, investment capital or experience necessary to found and run a successful business, with even a modest amount of money you can accumulate a stake in many of the world’s greatest businesses.

And it’s easy. A click of the mouse, a $5 commission, and you’re in. Another click – another $5 – and you’re out. (Compare that to your typical real estate closing.)

Owning a piece of a company is a whole lot simpler than running one. You don’t have to take out loans, sign personal guarantees, hire or fire employees, grapple with an avalanche of federal mandates and regulations, pay lawyers and accountants, or even show up for work. How great is that?

Some Americans today obsess over the issue of fairness. But the stock market shines here, too. If I own shares of Microsoft, for example, my gain over the next year will be exactly the same as the world’s richest man. Sure, Bill Gates may own a few more shares than I do, but our percentage returns will be the same.

Monitoring your portfolio has never been simpler either. You used to have to dig the price of your stocks out of the business section of the paper. (When was the last time you did that?) Or you could call your broker, get placed on hold for a few minutes, and eventually get a quote that – by the time you received it – was no longer current.

Today you don’t think twice about getting a real-time quote, placing a trade with a click and getting a near instantaneous confirmation.

Costs used to be exponentially higher, too. Brokers routinely sold mutual funds with front-end loads as high as 8.5%. (That’s not a misprint.)

Prior to May 1, 1975, brokerage commissions were steep – and fixed by law. Deregulation – and the debut of Charles Schwab – changed that. The internet steamrolled costs further still.

Spreads are far thinner today, too. When I started in the brokerage business 30 years ago, a large stock might have an eighth of a point spread – and a small one, a quarter of a point. Tack on a 2% or 3% commission, and you were down 5% by the time you got your trade confirmation.

Today – thanks in part to wrongly detested, high-frequency traders – liquidity is greater than ever and bid-ask spreads are often a penny.

The Easiest Way to Build a Fortune

Your investment choices have never been greater. Information has never been more widely available. Monitoring your portfolio has never been simpler. Spreads have never been thinner. Commissions have never been lower. Executions have never been swifter.

Owning a diversified portfolio of stocks is far less risky than tying up your money – and your life – in a single company.

Moreover, the same factors that could undermine a publicly traded company – debt, competition, inflation, a weak economy, etc. – can just as easily hurt a privately held one.

True, private business owners don’t see a share price that suddenly belly-flops from time to time. But every business is fluctuating in value each day, whether you see it or not.

Owning a diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks means you will definitely experience neck-snapping volatility from time to time. That’s the price of admission.

But if you have the patience and the temperament, it is the safest, easiest and most liquid way to build a fortune.

Bill’s suggestion? That’s the second-best way.

Good investing,

Alex

Get up to 14 dividend paychecks per month from safe, reliable stocks with The Monthly Dividend Paycheck Calendar, an easy-to-use system that shows you which dividend stocks to pick, when to buy them, when you get paid your dividends, and how much.  All you have to do is buy the stocks you like and tell them where to send your dividend payments. For more information Click Here.


Source: Investment U