Netflix and Amazon Have Plenty of Growth Ahead

Watching television in the ‘80s was easy.

Most of America has had just three broadcast channels to choose from — four if you were either really lucky or had someone stand next to the TV and hold the antenna.

Where I grew up in rural Kentucky, we were fortunate to get the Big Three: NBC, ABC and CBS. With only three channels to choose from, there was little need for a remote control, especially if you had a younger sibling you could make get up and turn the nob.

Until the late ‘80s to early ‘90s, when cable TV became mainstream, the Big Three ruled the American living room uncontested. They controlled everything you watched, from your mother’s soap operas to the nightly news to Saturday morning cartoons to late-night television. And they controlled when you watched them.

Commercials were king then, just as they are now, only the revenue they generated was considerably higher than today’s standards. After all, they had a captive market of consumers divided only three ways.

With their oligopoly in place, the Big Three grew fat, happy and complacent with their dominance of the TV market. So much so, that when cable TV finally rose to the mainstream, the Big Three still controlled the vast majority of channel offerings.

But while there were more channels, that didn’t necessarily mean more content. With only two other networks offering any real competition for American living rooms, the Big Three began recycling content across all the cable TV channels they controlled. As Bruce Springsteen so eloquently put it in the early ‘90s: “There’s 57 channels and nothin’ on.”

In 2007, 15 years after Springsteen’s lamentation of the state of American home entertainment, Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX) dropped a bomb that would forever change the landscape of American television: online video streaming.

And here we are, a decade later. The cable TV industry is dying, NBC, ABC and CBS viewership is in decline, and a new Big Three is emerging in the online world of streaming TV.

The New Big Three

A new era of American TV is rising from the ashes of the broadcast model, and a new Big Three has emerged to take the place of NBC, ABC and CBS. Investing in these companies now will get you in on the ground floor of not only the revolution in American living rooms, but global living rooms as well.

The cable TV industry is dying, NBC, ABC and CBS viewership is in decline, and Netflix and Amazon are taking over the online world of streaming TV.

Share of consumers who have a subscription to an on-demand video service in the United States in 2016 and 2017.
(Source: Statista)

Netflix — The Godfather of Online Streaming

No one should be surprised by the fact that Netflix is at the top of the current online streaming market. After adding 5.3 million subscribers last quarter, Netflix now has roughly 109.3 million subscribers around the globe.

Netflix currently dominates online streaming stateside, and is present in about 75% of all streaming households. Because of its market dominance, analysts are concerned about market saturation. After all, Netflix only added 850,000 U.S. subscribers last quarter. However, it’s important to point out that only one-third of American households currently stream online TV and movie content.

So, while Netflix may have saturated the current available market, that available market is set to grow by leaps and bounds as the rest of America wakes up to the online TV revolution.

What’s more, Netflix is already following in the early footsteps of broadcast TV pioneers. Founded on providing access to content produced elsewhere — Walt Disney comes to mind — Netflix is poised to spend $8 billion next year alone just to create its own original content. As with all things, the initial cash outlay is more than a bit off-putting. But once Netflix has a solid catalog of original content, spending is sure to fall more in line with the former kings of cable TV.

So, while NFLX stock is a bit on the pricey side right now (partly due to the stock market’s run-up on easy money), the shares still have plenty of growth ahead of them.

Amazon — The Jack of All Trades

With the amount of cash Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) has to throw around, it could easily topple Netflix and become the No. 1 streaming service. But that’s not Amazon’s business model. Amazon is a retailer, first and foremost — a task the company does extraordinarily well.

While Netflix gets the credit for being the first major online streaming company, Amazon actually launched its streaming service as Amazon Unbox in September 2006, about four months ahead of Netflix’s online launch. With its hands in several pots at once, Amazon didn’t really get serious about its streaming service until a few years ago.

After several name changes and service iterations, Amazon Instant Video was christened in February 2011 and bundled with Amazon Prime, giving the service an instant subscribership in the millions. How many millions remains unclear to this day, however, as Amazon has never released subscription numbers for either Prime or Instant Video, which was renamed again in September 2015 to simply Amazon Video.

Current estimates place U.S. Prime subscriber numbers at about 79 million, but there is still no way to tell whether or not every Prime member utilizes Amazon Video. Still, the estimated subscriber numbers are more than enough to put Amazon in the No. 2 spot behind Netflix as part of the new Big Three.

Clearly, Amazon isn’t content to let things rest at that. The company has launched Amazon Studios and is spending $4.5 billion this year on original content. Amazon is clearly getting serious about its Amazon Video service, and should come out swinging next year.

The cable TV industry is dying, NBC, ABC and CBS viewership is in decline, and Netflix and Amazon are taking over the online world of streaming TV.

(Sources: The companies, JPMorgan)

That said, AMZN stock is not a pure play on online streaming. The company brings with it considerable baggage and heavy spending across the board — not the least of which is Amazon’s move into the grocery market with its acquisition of Whole Foods Market.

For these, and a multitude of other concerns, I’m considerably less bullish on AMZN stock than I am on NFLX. In fact, I believe that Amazon Video will play more of a spoiler for Netflix than a real benefit for Amazon for the time being.

Hulu — The Broadcast Industry’s Frankenstein

It’s not fair to say that the original Big Three of broadcast television have no presence in online streaming. Hulu is, in fact, the old model trying to keep pace with the new.

The company is owned by a collaboration of “last generation” broadcasters and content creators, including Walt Disney (ABC), 21st Century Fox (Fox Entertainment), Comcast (NBC Universal), Time Warner (Turner Broadcasting System) and Japan-based Nippon TV.

But there are key differences that give Hulu a considerable advantage over both Netflix and Amazon. For one, Hulu gets first-run TV shows the week they air — which should come as a no-brainer since the companies producing the content are Hulu partners. That also means Hulu has considerably less overhead costs for content acquisition.

That said, Hulu has also moved into the realm of original content, spending $2.5 billion this year … with considerable success. In fact, Hulu upstaged both Netflix and Amazon this year by sweeping the awards at the Emmys.

That said, subscriber numbers are impossible to pin down on Hulu. The company stopped releasing subscriber figures last year when it said it had 12 million U.S. subscribers in 2016, compared to Netflix’s 47 million.

While Netflix now reports more than 52 million domestic subscribers, Hulu will only state that it has 47 million unique viewers, which it claims means more to advertisers. This metric is also convenient for diverting comparisons with Netflix’s subscriber base.

In case you missed it in the last paragraph, Hulu also has commercials in addition to its monthly subscription fees. It seems that some habits die hard where the former Big Three are concerned.

Finally, it is all but impossible to directly invest in Hulu. The collaboration is not publicly traded, and even investing in all the companies involved would be difficult, costly, and subject to more pitfalls and distractions than trying to make an online streaming trade out of Amazon.

A Final Note

For investing purposes, Netflix remains the best direct trade on the future of online streaming, with Amazon a close second.

These two giants are also international. No longer are just American living rooms in play, but Indian, British, Australian, Japanese and a host of other venues around the globe. For Hulu, it’s just America and Japan.

This is the real key difference in the new “TV” networks, and it’s why Netflix and Amazon are far from hitting the top of their current growth curve.

Until next time, good trading!

Joseph Hargett
Assistant Managing Editor, Banyan Hill Publishing

In this exciting NEW VIDEO, Wall Street legend and former multibillion hedge fund manager Paul Mampilly pulls back the curtain on the biggest investment opportunity in the market today. What insiders are calling “The Greatest Innovation in History,” this revolution will mint more millionaires and billions than any technology that came before it. Right now, the current market for this technology is just $235 billion, but given how fast this technology is moving experts predict it will soar to $19 trillion by 2020. But 8,000% growth is just the beginning—and now’s your chance to get in on the action. [CONTINUE TO VIDEO]

Source: Banyan Hill

Sell These 3 High Yield Stocks Before Earnings

Quarterly earnings release time is the real news make or break time for most publicly traded companies. For investors in many publicly traded companies, these once-every-three months information dumps are the only time actual business results can be reviewed and analyzed. All the stuff you read in the 90 days between release dates are just speculations, projections and guesses. When the actual earnings numbers come out, the market often is not kind to share prices when the earnings report or management statements include bad news or negative business projections.

If you regularly follow how a company’s business operates, it is possible to get an idea what may come out in the next earnings reports. With some companies, the economic conditions in their business sectors will provide a preview of what may happen when earnings are released. For example, energy companies are affected by changing values for crude oil, natural gas and fuels, depending on what they do in the broader energy market. With other companies the potential benefits and dangers are subtler, and unless you follow the companies very closely, you could get blindsided by a negative earnings report.

High yield shares are especially subject to falling share prices if the market reads the financial reports and decides there is potential for a dividend reduction. Nothing scares the market more than the fear of a dividend cut from a big dividend stock. Here are three high-yield stocks with significant probability of a negative earnings surprise.

Ship Finance International (NYSE: SFL) owns a diverse fleet of commercial vessels. These ships are leased on long term contracts to shipping operators. Ship Finance gets a significant portion of its revenue from Seadrill Limited (NYSE: SDRL) which is going through a bankruptcy like reorganization. Ship Finance has worked out a new payment scheme with Seadrill, and in late August the SFL dividend was reduced by 22%. Contrary to what you would expect, after the initial price decline following the dividend announcement, the SFL share price has gained over 14%. I think the market is wrong about Ship Finance doing better after the dividend cut. I reviewed the company’s two must recent earnings reports and there are negative headwinds in several of the shipping sectors. I recommend against holding SFL shares through the earnings release in late November.

Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NYSE: NLY) is a high-yield, agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) owning REIT. In its 2017 first quarter earnings report the company owned $74 billion worth of agency MBS. The company owns $10 billion of other assets, including $5 billion of commercial property mortgages. This large pile of assets is held aloft by a total of $72 billion of debt. In the quarter, Annaly reported an average asset yield of 2.93% and an interest cost of 1.74% leaving a net spread of 1.19%. This spread is down from the second quarter and almost half of the 2.28% spread reported in the first quarter of 2016. Long term rates as indicated by the 10-year Treasury bond remain stubbornly in the 2.25 to 2.3% range. The Fed plans to continue to increase short term rates. Last quarter, NLY just covered the $0.30 per share dividend. If the company does not cover the dividend this quarter, the share price will fall. This company’s profits are being tightly squeezed and the next Fed rate increase is going to significantly tighten the noose.

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (NYSE: KREF) is a very new commercial mortgage REIT. The company came to market with a May 4 IPO. The shares were priced at $20.50, and now, are trading at $21.35. The company had $838 million dollars of committed capital at the end of 2016. The IPO raised another $200 million, which went into the KREF asset base. The prospectus lists a book value per share of $19.91 following the IPO. The public float after the IPO is 21.5% of the total shares. As of March 31, 2017, the company had originated $1.08 billion dollars of targeted assets. These asset types are senior real estate loans, mezzanine loans, and commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS) “B pieces”. The third quarter earnings report will be KREF’s releasing of its first full quarter results. The danger with this stock is that it appears to be overpriced with a current 6.9% yield. Other, much larger, more established commercial mortgage REITs yield 7.9 to 8.8%. If KREF does not come out with very spectacular earnings then I expect that the market will start to price this stock like its peers, which means a 14% to 20% share price decline.

SFL, NLY, and KREF are the types of investments that I help my Dividend Hunter readers avoid. Nothing will damage your income portfolio like a high yield stock that cuts its dividend. Instead, my readers are holding onto quality high yield stocks collect the dividends every month as part of a new income system called the Monthly Dividend Paycheck Calendar. It’s currently set to pay out over $40,000 a year in extra income and has an important action date right around the corner.

Get up to 14 dividend paychecks per month from safe, reliable stocks with The Monthly Dividend Paycheck Calendar, an easy-to-use system that shows you which dividend stocks to pick, when to buy them, when you get paid your dividends, and how much.  All you have to do is buy the stocks you like and tell them where to send your dividend payments. For more information Click Here.

Source: Investors Alley